Loading ForensicBlock
Preparing your blockchain forensics platform...
Preparing your blockchain forensics platform...
Spouses who hide digital assets in self-custody wallets leave an on-chain trail. We support family-law litigators with wallet discovery from known on-ramps, transaction reconstruction across chains, valuation context on the relevant trace date, and a sealed examiner declaration the court can rely on.
From identified exchange/PSP accounts back to self-custody wallets via withdrawal patterns, address reuse, and behavioral clustering — every attribution sourced.
Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, Avalanche, Tron. Stablecoins + native assets. Snapshot-date holdings reconstructed deterministically.
Reference prices on the snapshot date. We surface the price, the source, and the time — we do not opine on appraisal questions outside our scope.
Counsel sends what's been disclosed (exchange records, bank withdrawals to crypto-PSPs). We propose the on-chain follow-up and a discovery-request scaffold.
Tracer + Analyst follow the on-ramp withdrawals into self-custody. Cross-chain holdings reconstructed on the relevant date.
Reference prices sourced. Examiner narrative explains the methodology in plain English a judge can read.
Examiner declaration with attached exhibits. Methodology-versioned, hashes anchored, opposing-counsel-verifiable.
We do not give legal advice. We do read the case law that shapes the matter so the report we produce dovetails with the strategy your counsel will run.
Fed. R. Evid. 901(a)
Authentication threshold for on-chain records. Our methodology-versioned + content-hashed reports clear it.
Effective 12/01/2017
Self-authentication when accompanied by a qualified person's certification — the certification block in our sealed reports.
State-by-state adoption
Frames disclosure obligations for marital property — including crypto holdings — at the time of agreement or in litigation.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, 34
Discovery framework for digital-asset records. Our reports format cleanly as Rule 26 disclosures and Rule 34 productions.
What we are — and what we're not.
We are forensic examiners; we do not appraise marital property, opine on equitable distribution, or render valuation opinions outside the on-chain reconstruction. We do not de-anonymize wallets that have not interacted with attributable on-ramps; where the attribution chain breaks, the report says so on its face. Family-law counsel runs the matter; we equip it with the on-chain evidence.
Preliminary trace is complimentary. No payment, no contract — we read the on-chain footprint and tell you honestly whether the matter is one we can move.