Loading ForensicBlock
Preparing your blockchain forensics platform...
Preparing your blockchain forensics platform...
We're not an investigation tool. We're not a KYT vendor. We're the discovery discipline for the on-chain record — identify, preserve, collect, produce — and the forensics that make the production defensible: chain of custody, examiner declaration, FRE 902(13)/(14) self-authentication, verified by opposing counsel in a browser without an account. Investigation answers what happened; forensics answers can you prove it to a court. We produce the exhibit.
A world where blockchain evidence is held to the same standard as any other forensic exhibit — reproducible, independently verifiable, and defensible on a witness stand — so that digital-asset wrongdoing can be proven to a court, not merely alleged.
Every day we turn blockchain intelligence — from any platform, any exchange response, any reviewer's own working file, or a trace we run ourselves — into court-ready, independently verifiable evidence: preserved with its custody, labelled for production, signed by a named examiner, and reproducible, so litigators, trustees, and asset-recovery counsel can prove what happened to a court rather than merely investigate it.
The blockchain-intelligence platforms answer what an address is and what your exposure is, and most firms already pay one. That output is intelligence: it is not Bates-labelled, it carries no custody from the moment your firm received it, it does not reconcile against the exchange's subpoena return or your reviewer's own spreadsheet, and nobody from the vendor is going to sign a declaration for you. ForensicBlock is the layer that turns it into evidence — any source in, preserved with its custody and its rights; one exhibit out, labelled, produceable, and verifiable by the recipient without trusting us.
Keep the intelligence platform you already pay for — we are the layer it hands off to, not the one it competes with. Its strength is knowing what an address is; ours is making what it knows produceable: received with custody, reconciled against the exchange's subpoena return, Bates-labelled, examiner-signed, and verifiable by the other side without an account. The platforms find the answer. We make it evidence.
Investigation answers 'what happened.' Forensics answers 'can you prove it to a court.' We produce the exhibit.
ForensicBlock is blockchain discovery & forensics: identify, preserve, collect, and produce the on-chain record — and the intelligence written about it — with the same discipline discovery already demands for documents. Your team keeps the workflow it knows; the record type is the only thing that is new.
What the proprietary incumbents cannot hand you: a verdict computed by deterministic engines — not a model score — behind a published, versioned methodology the other side can reproduce line for line; attribution that ships with its sources so it can be republished in an exhibit, never license-locked; a public verifier that opens without an account; and a self-hashed Audit Pack a defense expert can re-derive. Their product is the black box; they can't open it without giving up the moat that is their business.
A proprietary risk score arrives at a court as a number somebody has to get on a stand and defend. ForensicBlock hands a court a reproducible computation instead: deterministic engines produce every figure behind a published, versioned methodology, so the derivation is on the table for the other side to re-run — there is nothing hidden in it to attack. A platform whose product IS the model cannot answer that way without opening the thing it sells.
Verify a real sealed report in a browser — the verifier recomputes the SHA-256 seal live. No account required.
Verify a sealed reportVersioned and content-hashed, published in full. Same input, same output — reproducible across runs.
Read the methodologyBring one real address from a real matter and see the record we build — the preliminary trace runs as part of scoping, before any engagement fee.
Request a scope callA report from any blockchain-intelligence platform, an exchange's response, a subpoena return, a government record, or a reviewer's own spreadsheet — each arrives as evidence rather than as an attachment: typed by source, hashed before anything parses it, custody recorded from the moment your firm received it, with privilege and licence captured. We are not asking you to replace a platform or move a workflow. What we do not claim is that we parse every vendor's proprietary format into our own graph — that is a different capability, and saying otherwise would be a promise the intake gate could not keep.
Reports are built as exhibits, not intelligence reads: FRE 902(13)/(14) self-authentication packaging, an examiner-of-record posture, and a methodology that is versioned and disclosed. We never represent that a sealed report is automatically admissible — self-authentication is not admissibility, and we say so on the page.
The number in an exhibit is not a proprietary score — deterministic engines produce it, so the derivation is on the table rather than hidden in a model. Opposing counsel can re-run it and recompute the SHA-256 seal in the public verifier with no account, and the self-hashed Audit Pack lets a defense expert re-derive the record. Verification never depends on trusting us, and there is nothing secret to put on a stand.
Daubert-aligned: the same input yields the same output. The deterministic verdict and scoring engine never learns, so a past run stays reproducible even as the catalog grows; the methodology hash and the sanctions/attribution catalog state at generation time are disclosed as required reproduction inputs.
A hash-chained audit log records every mutation; the audit lineage is independently timestamped under RFC 3161 and anchored to Bitcoin via OpenTimestamps. Six forensic agents — Tracer, Sentinel, Examiner, Hunter, Custodian, Sealer — carry evidence from first trace to sealed exhibit.
We trace digital assets across 7 live chains to their landing endpoints, name the records-holding institutions that are the real subpoena targets, and hand recovery counsel subpoena-ready packages — turning a trace into an actionable path to the funds.
No fabricated data: every number on screen links to a real surface, org-scoped data refuses missing context with a visible refusal rather than a silent empty, and an honest empty is never a hidden error. The honesty contract is the brand moat, and it is enforced in code.
Each agent owns one link in the chain of custody, so the record is assembled the same way every time and every step is reproducible.
Multi-hop fund-flow tracing with bridge and mixer detection
OFAC/SDN screening and per-factor risk scoring
Behavioral pattern analysis — peel chains, fan-out, layering, anomalies
Recovery probability assessment and exchange identification
Real-time address monitoring and custody-relevant event capture
Evidence compilation and sealed, court-ready report generation
Built for the people who have to defend the work on a stand — litigators, trustees, asset-recovery counsel, expert witnesses, and the law-enforcement and compliance teams working digital-asset matters. AmLaw litigation practices are the wedge.
AmLaw litigation practices building the fund-flow record for a complaint, motion, or trial exhibit.
Bankruptcy and receivership estates locating, tracing, and marshalling digital assets.
Recovery teams that need the landing endpoint, the records-holder, and a subpoena-ready package.
Experts who have to defend the methodology on a stand under a Daubert challenge.
LE and compliance units working digital-asset matters that must survive review.
Start with a free preliminary trace, or open a real sealed report and verify the seal yourself — no account required.